Advance Directive in End of Life Decision
Keywords:End of Life, Pallative, Ethics Committee, Yoruba
Increased capacity of health care professionals, armed with improved medical technologies, to sustain life even when there is no hope of recovery has created more need for decision making than ever. With the advancement in medical technology the question of when to let patients die is a subject of debate among physicians, philosophers and theologians – “the dilemma of modern medicine” what men value is closely connected with how they view the universe, with their “Weltanschauung” which affects biomedical field because. Value as perceived in the field enters mightily into decision-making and influence things how people make decisions. End-of-life decision making is value laden arising from the norms and values of society. In Africa, little is known about end-of-life decision making within the context of bioethics. Hence, it is difficult to understand what role ethics committees have played. This paper examines the ethnomethological perspective of this issue in a rapidly expanding bioethical global age
Methodology: The study utilized an anthropological approach to documenting contemporary issues in end-of-life decision making in Yoruba culture of Nigeria. Specifically, it aimed at examining the concept of death, cultural beliefs about end-of-life decision making, factor influencing end-of-life decision making and the role of ethics committees in end-of-life decision making. Thirty In-depth Interviews were conducted among young and adult male and female in two selected Yoruba communities. Content analytical approach was used for data analysis.
Result: In Yoruba culture, death is socially constructed being interpreted as “Iku” (meaning: end of existence). It has spiritual, physical and social significance. Hierarchy of authority is the basis of implementing traditional advance directive. Socialization, gender, form of marriage, property, patriarchy, religious belief and tradition are the major considerations in end-of-life decision making. Education, public engagement, resource allocation and advocacy are important roles for ethics committees.
Conclusion: Further research into end-of-life decision making strategies will illuminate the diversity of cultural practices about end-of-life decision making and strengthen clinical practice.
The Bioethics Online (BeOnline®) Journal is a publication of the Center for Bioethics and Research which publishes peer-reviewed Bioethics-related articles quarterly.
It is a principle of the journal to place emphases on articles with significant theoretical or social bioethical potential impact, backed by rigorous logic and presented in clear and delightful fashion. Articles in this category with global or cross-cultural advantages will be given priority.
Submission of articles is a proposition to transfer the rights to the publishers and only articles with substances not yet published and not being simultaneously presented to any other journal are accepted for considerations. Such articles will also not be presented to any other journal unless and until it is rejected by the journal or formally and expressly withdrawn by the author(s).
BeOnline® accepts no responsibility for article contents and expressly affirms that all conclusions expressed are at best tentative and do not constitute policies or materials for similar use, as such.